MikrtoTik Engineering Team, please try to reduce the value of Retr such that higher and stable throughput rate can be achieved by solving the problems described in this thread.Ĭode: Select all Accepted connection from 192.168.55.70, port 58918 The lower the value, the better the data transfer. This is a indicator of how good of the data transfer. Please note that the value of Retr is extremely high. The obtained results are 72.6 Mbits/sec and Retr=10266 over a five minute test.
LINUX 4.11 BCM4360 PRO
I have a downstream test via the following pathįile server (iperf3 server) -> network switch -> WAN of R1 ->wlan2 of R1 -> wlan2 of R2 -> LAN of R2 -> connected to laptop PC (MacBook Pro Retina 2015. With suitable configuration on R2, a laptop pc, connected to one of LAN ports of R2, can access the Internet. The wlan2 (5GHz) of R2 was removed from the bridge and connected to the wlan2 of R1. The WAN port of R1 connected to the Internet via a number of routers. They are configured as back-to-back via the 5GHz wireless link. Nevertheless, both the Company and customers learned a great lesson from hAP ac^2, launched in 2018.īack to my findings, it is supposed that there are two hAP ac^2s, namely R1 and R2. Simply, low price of the product CAN'T be an apologize for such a big issues. I can also accept the higher price for products when I receive a really high quality, well tested and fine-tuned product with good support. I can accept the fact that some products have issues (well, it should not be the case for 22 years old company), but I am OK with it if I know that vendor cares and is actively working on the solution. I do not want to blame anyone, other vendors have also their issues, but what makes a difference is the way of treating their customers and support level. When I wrote negative feedback to thread about new LTE products, and said that instead of launching tons of new products, instead of blaming their customers that they are using "cheap China phones" (see viewtopic.php?f=7&t=102908) and completely ignoring this really long time problem, MikroTik should think MUCH more about the issues they have on table for really long time and no one cares, my post was deleted. What is much worse is the fact that forum administrators are deleting posts with negative feedback about the company behavior as a whole - no, it's not a fairy tale, but mine real experience.
They are your loyalty customers and you want to keep them I believe.įully agreed, but unfortunately this is a normal way of (non)communication from MikroTik.
I think for most of posters under this thread hAP ac2 is not their first MikroTik device.
What happens and when you will fix this issue. We need an official representative from MikroTik give us at least an explanation. This is a formal product not a beta or preview version.